backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 37 comment(s) - last by elgueroloco.. on Jul 22 at 3:37 PM


The consumer-grade absorption chiller under development by UC3M uses the heat of the sun to cool water.  (Source: Universidad Carlos III of Madrid)
The sun will keep you cool in just a few seasons.

The Montreal Protocol, crafted in 1987 and signed by 191 countries as of 2007, put the hot iron to the cooling industry. It has seen several revisions since 1987 and some of its strictures affect industry as a whole while others involve mainly cooling and refrigeration.

The ultimate goal of the protocol is to reduce the amount of several ozone-depleting chemicals used by industrialized nations to zero. Most CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) were to be phased out of use by 1996; other less dangerous CFCs and chemicals are to be phased out by 2010; HCFCs (hydrochlorofluorocarbons) are on a longer leash, and have cease and desist date of 2030, 2020 in developed nations.

Unfortunately for the air-conditioning and refrigeration industries, this means an industry-wide change in practice, as HCFCs are commonly used as refrigerants in modern cooling machines. There are several technologies that cool without the use of these refrigerants, but until recently, they have been utilized mostly only in large-scale applications. Absorption chillers are used in many industries, from commercial to machinery cooling.

Absorption chilling differs from standard mechanical air conditioning in that it doesn't use an active force, such as a compressor, to condense the coolant chemical, but rather uses heat to drive a circulatory system. Many absorption chillers are utilized in areas where ample amounts of waste heat are available (turbine power or water heating systems are common sources). This allows them to make use of waste heat for a secondary purpose, thereby making the entire system more efficient and cost-effective.

This nearly century-old technology has not been widely used in consumer arenas like home cooling as the heat needed to power the system would cost more than the typical compressor-driven air-conditioning unit and there are not usually readily available sources of waste heat powerful enough to harness. Professor Marcelo Izquierdo of the Universidad Carlos III of Madrid and his group of researchers are aiming to put this technology into homes, however, with a little help from a very large furnace – the sun.

Izquierdo's team built an absorption chiller unit that closely resembles a typical exterior air-conditioning unit, and it works by capturing solar energy and residual heat to provide the impetus for the system's circulation. The device uses a refined lithium bromide-based coolant process – most absorption chillers use either an ammonia, hydrogen and water or a lithium bromide solution and water system – and is capable of cooling water to a temperature of 7C to 18C with an ambient temperature of 33 to 43C. The machine can produce enough chilled water to cool a 120 cubic meter area via a water-to-air heat exchanger.

Neither the lithium-bromide solution nor the more common ammonia and hydrogen systems are ozone depleting. This makes them a viable alternative to the HCFC refrigerants used in modern compression systems. In the very near future, consumer-grade absorption chiller units could become common in many regions that experience high temperatures during one or many seasons. Using the Big Heater in the Sky itself to power the cooling units is an ironic twist and one definitely worthy of more research.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

But...
By soloman02 on 7/20/2008 5:25:17 PM , Rating: 3
This is all well and good, but what if there is no sunlight? Right now it is hot (80F) and very humid but no sun. Also will this system dehumidify? My current AC unit (conventional) cools the air and dehumidifies the air. Can this new one dehumidify as well?




RE: But...
By Spyvie on 7/20/2008 5:53:16 PM , Rating: 2
It's not possible to cool air without dehumidifying it, unless the air is already dry. As air passes over the chiller coils condensation will form on the surfaces pulling moisture out of the air.

The only type of refrigeration system that minimizes moisture loss is a static coil system, like the kind used in deli cases. This is where a large evaporator coil is positioned at the top of the refrigerated space, and the heat is absorbed from the product below. (cold air just spills off of the coil. This is a fairly inefficient setup, but it keeps the ham sammiches from drying out.


RE: But...
By soloman02 on 7/20/2008 8:12:40 PM , Rating: 2
Ok, but that still doesn't answer the question of the sun. If it is humid and 80-90F out and we want cool dry air, this thing won't work. Even if the sun is out this new system won't work unless the temperature is 91F or higher. There some people on this rock who prefer cold weather and not hot weather. If I could live farther north I would, but I refuse to be taxed in Maine and refuse to live in Canada. So I like my AC unit to work when I want it to, not when the temperature outside reaches91F or higher.


RE: But...
By smitty3268 on 7/20/2008 9:26:06 PM , Rating: 2
Presumably, any commercial implementation would also plug into the wall to get extra electricity whenever the solar unit couldn't meet demand.


RE: But...
By Ringold on 7/20/08, Rating: 0
RE: But...
By ipay on 7/21/08, Rating: -1
RE: But...
By ZmaxDP on 7/21/2008 6:07:45 PM , Rating: 1
As long as there is light enough to see some solar radiation is falling on the earth. The presence of clouds does not equate to the lack of solar energy.

Since it is unclear from either article how exactly this unit uses solar energy. (The picture shows no solar collectors so it could be photovoltaics providing electric current used in a resistance heater, or it could be evacuated tubes providing a hot water source, or it could be some less sexy solar heat collecting mechanism alltogether. Heck, it could even be nothing but ambient temperature driving this thing in which case lack of direct sunlight is a complete non-issue. Even assuming it required some amount of direct sunlight...

I would counter that some people from Europe and other countries as well should realize that sometimes the usefulness of a technology (or lack thereof) is merely a limitation of physics and not some egotistical conspiracy by a bunch of self-centered Americans.

Or, equally...

Some people from Europe should realize that the US is very large place and it isn't Sunny and 90+ degrees Fahrenheit everywhere here either.

Or, more importantly...

Everywhere I've been in Spain is freakin' beautiful compared to the states, from the architecture to the climate to the landscape. So, deal with the fact that our fancy new absorption AC won't work in Spain. We're just trying to make up for the lack of history and presence that pervades most of Europe. It's all Napoleon complex (which y'all should know a little about - no pun intended), we're just trying to compensate here. Cut us a little slack... (having a little fun)


RE: But...
By ZmaxDP on 7/21/2008 6:09:15 PM , Rating: 2
Man, I hate not being able to edit. When you come back to a response after a little interruption it really kills your grammar...


RE: But...
By ZmaxDP on 7/21/2008 5:42:58 PM , Rating: 2
It got voted down because the technology (unlike the headline of the article) does not require sun, but merely a source of heat. This can be supplied by any number of "technologies" from solar collection to lumps of coal. Well, that and that it sure didn't seem like a question at first glance. Also, like most thing it doesn't simply stop working below 91 degrees but is merely less efficient translating to less capacity. Sometimes you need to read a little more into these things than what Dailytech puts into their snippet.

A far more relevant question about the actual technology is it's efficiency compared to a more traditional system, and in what regions and over what time span would this type of unit be cheaper to operate.

An even more relevant question would be about the makeup of the space they were cooling. A traditional home system relies on air loss through doors, windows and other gaps in the envelope to replace interior air with exterior air. This tends to be good for building costs since you don't need the additional ductwork and equipment (and labor to properly seal a home) but it tends to be rather expensive for operation costs since you loose the opportunity to reclaim that energy. Also, the average R values for the various envelope components have a major effect over what a unit of a given size can cool.

So, for instance, we built as a test case a 600 sq. ft. home that was properly sealed had R30 continuous insulation (no studs) for the walls, ceiling, and floors and had a separate dehumidifier and air exchanger in addition to the AC unit. We were able to use a cooling unit sized to a 400 sq ft room and we couldn't run it nearly enough to properly dehumidify the air (hence the separate dehumidifier). We did a calculation later and determined that if we'd installed a unit sized to roughly 150 sq ft instead of 400 that we wouldn't have needed the dehumidifier. So, the envelope's performance can make a HUGE difference in the size of unit you require. In short, build your house right and this very unit could cool an entire 2000 sq. ft. house. (Just be prepared to pay a bit more for construction and to recoup your costs over a period of time...)


RE: But...
By caqde on 7/21/2008 2:17:22 AM , Rating: 3
I think this was meant for people living in areas like AZ where the sun is almost always out and it is often well over 90 degrees and dry. So for me right now this thing would probably save me around $100 or more a month.


RE: But...
By wookie1 on 7/21/2008 12:14:29 PM , Rating: 2
Not so good for AZ, after the sun goes down it is still over 100 degrees for several hours.


RE: But...
By Solandri on 7/21/2008 1:04:32 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
It's not possible to cool air without dehumidifying it, unless the air is already dry. As air passes over the chiller coils condensation will form on the surfaces pulling moisture out of the air.

Actually, evaporative cooling (swamp coolers, those misters you see in some desert cities, your sweat) will cool the air and increase the humidity at the same time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaporative_cooling#E...


RE: But...
By TennesseeTony on 7/21/2008 5:58:03 PM , Rating: 2
An excellent point, about the evaporative cooling, the mist making machines, but clearly that is not the system we're discussing here. We're talking about moving air over a chilled water coil (radiator).

In this application, this method of cooling, it is impossible to cool the air without getting the air nearer to it's dew point or below it's dew point. If it drops below the dew point (65F almost certainly would do the trick), then yes, it will remove the humidity.


RE: But...
By JonnyDough on 7/22/2008 3:19:36 AM , Rating: 2
Are you a complete moron or just another Hollywood actress?

If there's no sun we don't really need air conditioning now do we? It might be a bit hard to imagine if you're from SoCo, but take it from someone that lives in the northern northern hemisphere - without the sun we would need heaters, not air conditioning. Just trust me when I tell you...(because I actually graduated from a high school that didn't pass me based on my wealthy father's generous aspirations for me)...it's true!


RE: But...
By elgueroloco on 7/22/2008 3:37:00 PM , Rating: 2
I would ask if you are the moron. Apparently you've never been anywhere below Canada or wherever you're from up north, but in many places it stays dreadfully hot well after the sun goes down. Virginia is one example. I could hardly sleep there during the summer without air conditioning. It was around 90 degrees all night, and so humid the sheets felt sticky. All this despite it being night time (i.e. no sunlight).

I don't know if you just totally misunderstood his post, or can't imagine that places exist where it might be hot at night. Funny thing is, you criticize him for being unable to imagine any other place than SoCo (Southern Comfort? Good Drink. Southern Colorado? If you meant Southern California, as hinted by your reference to Hollywood, you should have put SoCal), then you go on to make a statement which indicates you can't imagine any place exists other than the far northern hemisphere, as if the weather conditions in other parts of the world don't actually exist because where you live it's cold at night.

I'm baffled as to how you thought the other guy was the idiot. As for the high school you graduated from, it sounds like you might want to go back. Probably to 9th grade and start all over again.


RE: But...
By JonnyDough on 7/22/2008 3:23:49 AM , Rating: 2
Dehumidifier = thanks. Obviously, as everyone else already told you.

I keep my house @ 80ish in the summer here in Michigan, and the winters get below 0. 80 is just fine as long as you're not an old person or a fatty. You can wear shorts and no top provided you're a guy, and if we weren't pushed around by a bunch of religious freaks you could go topless as a woman too. But not if you're guy. It's impossible, regardless of what a surgeon says.


Einstein refrigerator
By dnd728 on 7/20/2008 4:09:12 PM , Rating: 2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator

I always figured it isn't being used this way due to the toxicity of the coolant. :/




RE: Einstein refrigerator
By SiliconJon on 7/20/2008 4:34:43 PM , Rating: 2
During my previous career we had a cooling device that worked with our air-fed outfits which cooled our hood intake air using nothing more than the same compressed air tube that was feeding us the "fresh" air. I can't find what it was called or exactly how it worked, though.