backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 38 comment(s) - last by bohhad.. on Jul 29 at 2:20 AM


An artist's rendition of the Deep Impact probe, recently renamed EPOXI, and its impactor, which successfully crashed into comet Tempel 1 in July of 2005.  (Source: NASA)
A unique home video may help astronomers identify Earth-like planets that are slightly out of our zip code.

In July of last year, DailyTech reported on the mission extensions of two NASA spacecraft: Deep Impact and Stardust. Both comet-chasers, the probes completed their primary missions successfully and are slated for more flybys in 2010 and 2011 respectively. Stardust's 2011 rendezvous with comet Tempel 1 will mark the first time a comet has been visited by two separate Earth vehicles.

Deep Impact, however, is presently on another mission while waiting for its 2010 date with comet Hartley 2. The EPOXI mission, or Extrasolar Planet Observations and Characterization (EPOCh) and Deep Impact eXtended Investigation (DIXI), is presently returning a wealth of information about how astronomers might identify Earth-like extrasolar planets.

As it lounges around in space waiting for Hartley 2, Deep Impact will make observations of five extrasolar systems previously detected by other means. Each of these systems has at least one transitory planet, or a planet that orbits in such a way to pass between its star and Earth's point of view. By using several observations of these planets, astronomers can subtract the local star's light from combined views and get a good idea of what a planet's atmosphere might be composed of by analyzing the leftover data. Different atmospheric compositions reflect light differently, and by using this data, they can infer what elements and chemicals are present.

But this is not the only type of data that will help discover new Earths. Recently, NASA published a video taken by Deep Impact at a distance of 31 million miles from Big Blue. The video is the first of its kind, clearly showing the moon, with a good amount of detail, transitioning Earth. While the video is interesting for just this sight, it also gives clues of what to look for in visible and near-visible light from nearby planets that might have a similar ecosystem or geological makeup.

Clearly visible in the video is the sun's light, glinting off the oceans as Earth spins in view. Where a continent passes, the glint momentarily vanishes. Should a telescope view an extrasolar planet from a similar angle, the same telltale flickering glint could easily indicate the presence of dry land mass and liquid or ice oceans of some kind.

Another sign of a life-bearing planet becomes more visible in near-infrared. Foliage reflects light more strongly in this span of the electromagnetic spectrum, thus a similar pattern of reflections could be the hallmark of Earth-like vegetation.

These ideas are similar to ones published in a paper by University of Florida researchers, which was covered by DailyTech last December. Though many of the ideas are similar, this is the first time hard data has been available to bolster the brain spills. The videos themselves are available at NASA's website in .mov format and can be viewed with either red-green-blue visible light filtering, or infrared-green-blue filtering.

Deep Impact will continue to relay data on the five systems its mission planners have assigned to it as it lingers patiently, waiting for comet Hartley 2 to come calling. In this time it may return more valuable data and further foster ideas on how to identify alien Earths that are not much more than a pixel in images taken by modern telescopes. At worst, the data collected on its target star systems will help astronomers learn about solar systems unlike our own and how their planets interact with their stars and each other.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I've always wondered..
By imaheadcase on 7/21/08, Rating: 0
RE: I've always wondered..
By Senju on 7/21/08, Rating: 0
RE: I've always wondered..
By Pottervilla on 7/21/08, Rating: -1
RE: I've always wondered..
By Screwballl on 7/21/08, Rating: -1
RE: I've always wondered..
By B3an on 7/21/2008 2:06:29 PM , Rating: 2
But it's also proven 100x more things that are in the bible are not true, and/or are not possible.

I dont think finding life on other planets will change much when it comes to religion or the bible. Becuase things like hard facts and stuff that can be proven has little effect on religious freaks.
For instance you could argue with one for a whole day and use countless facts and common logical sense, yet get nowhere.


RE: I've always wondered..
By Screwballl on 7/21/2008 5:34:10 PM , Rating: 1
Nothing in the bible has been disproven... yet much of whats in the bible has been proven... again, you are using opinions, not facts to say they are not true or not possible. Facts/science have proven much in the Bible to be true and possible and events that have happened... yet there has not been anything disproven/impossible to date that is stated as a fact. The only items stated as impossible is stated as an opinion, not fact.

Why do you think that the well educated scientists are also very religious? They see that this stuff is proven by their science.

What facts and common sense are you speaking of? If you mean opinions and flawed morals then go ahead and argue, only other uneducated anti-religion freaks will listen.


RE: I've always wondered..
By MrBungle123 on 7/21/2008 5:58:40 PM , Rating: 1
There are many things in the bible that are verifiable through archeological evidence/exploration; the names of cities, the reigns of certain kings, military campaigns etc... For things of this nature the bible can be used as reference to fill in the blanks and more than likely can be taken as fact.

However the bible is also a religious text so it also makes lots of claims about things of a supernatural nature which can be neither tested nor verified. As such I am reluctant to just simply take the bible at its word simply because it listed a few names and places accurately. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and getting a few things right doesn't necessarily give something credibility especially when it comes to events like people riding chariots of fire into heaven, and raising people from the dead. Saying that these events haven’t been “disproven” is a farce, they need to be proved, the burden of proof lies with the one making the claim not the doubter.


RE: I've always wondered..
By B3an on 7/21/2008 8:41:02 PM , Rating: 2
What? You're saying mostly uneducated people are anti-religious/do not believe in god? and they have flawed morals? Wow. There not the ones having some religious book/text telling them what to do, that was written by ordinary men, and has been changed countless times over the years.

It's usually the other way around anyway. Which is why things like Creationism are not taken seriously in the better educated european coutries, your'd just get laughed at for mentioning it. Theres also far less religious people in counties like the UK, France, Germany than in the US...

As for disproving the bible, just do a search (hate speech in the bible is also another good one). To many things to list... where would i start??


RE: I've always wondered..
By ggordonliddy on 7/21/08, Rating: 0
RE: I've always wondered..
By bohhad on 7/21/2008 9:00:12 PM , Rating: 4
ok, here. god created adam and eve.

we evolved, we werent created.


RE: I've always wondered..
By ggordonliddy on 7/22/2008 1:45:40 PM , Rating: 2
That's all you can come up with? Obviously there is a debate of creationism vs evolution.


RE: I've always wondered..
By MrBungle123 on 7/22/2008 2:35:29 PM , Rating: 2
We can see the Galaxy of Andromeda (2.5MLY away) therefore the universe is older than 6000 years.


RE: I've always wondered..
By bohhad on 7/22/2008 8:18:43 PM , Rating: 2
it's not a debate. science provides evidence, while religion provides stories. you need to have two sides for a debate... at least

anyway, lets put the shoe on the other foot. why don't you give me some evidence god is real?


RE: I've always wondered..
By ggordonliddy on 7/24/2008 10:27:33 PM , Rating: 2
Do you not realize that evidence is NOT the same as proof?


RE: I've always wondered..
By ggordonliddy on 7/24/2008 10:39:54 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
evidence god is real


I think it must be the case that a higher being was involved in the creation of the universe. Otherwise, where did the matter come from that is theorized to have expanded into our universe? Of course you can go crazy trying to wrap your mind around God having been around forever, but some thing or being had to have been around forever, and I don't think that something can just have been an inanimate object (because if it were just an inanimate object, it would have to have been created by something/someone, and you're just back to the same puzzle).


RE: I've always wondered..
By bohhad on 7/25/2008 2:58:22 PM , Rating: 2
don't get me wrong, even tho i don't believe the bible literally, i do believe there is something somewhere greater than us. i've long felt our universe is nothing more than some grand creatures goldfish bowl. otherwise, as you stated... all of this could not have sprung from just a void.

but, evidence not being proof? thats just crazy talk, and if what you say is true, our court system is waste of time. pieces of evidence taken together form proof of a hypothesis. if i have a videotape (evidence) of you robbing a gas station for instance, i would definitely say its proof you did it. (not that you are that kind of person)