backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 177 comment(s) - last by icanhascpu.. on Nov 23 at 10:28 PM


This image was snapped by Hubble of one of the four planets, which orbits the star Fomalhaut 25 light-years from Earth.  (Source: NASA)

A second image of three planets orbitting the star HR 8799 was taken by the Gemini Observatory in Hawaii, which consists of two large 8-m reflecting telescopes (note HR8799d is not in image shown).  (Source: NASA/Gemini Observatory)

This artist rendition represents how the HR 8799 worlds might look when viewed up close.  (Source: Gemini Observatory)
Beautiful new images reveal our first visual glimpse that other solar systems share planets just like ours does

One of the central themes both to science fiction and to real-life space progress was the drive to find and eventually travel to extrasolar plants.  In recent years, constantly improving computer processing and better imaging technology have allowed scientists to at last confirm what many have long fantasized -- there's a wealth of planets outside our solar system.

From water bearing planets to ultra-hot ones, and even with a few that resembled larger versions of Earth, extrasolar planets thus far have shown great variety.  Most of these planets were detected using Doppler, or "wobble," technique to locate stars which were tugged at by the gravity of orbiting planets, leading to a wobble.  Thus far, infrared images from the NASA Spitzer Space Telescope and spectral analysis of composition had provided us of our clearest picture of these worlds.  However, the public has never seen a picture of an extrasolar planet -- until now.

The new images, developed by NASA and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory are the first-ever pictures taken from the visible spectrum, glimpsed by the Gemini North and Keck telescopes on the Mauna Kea mountaintop in Hawaii.  British and American researchers snapped the first ever visible-light pictures of three extrasolar planets orbiting the star HR8799.  HR8799 is about 1.5 times the size of the sun, located 130 light-years away in the Pegasus constellation.  Observers can probably see this star through binoculars, scientists said.

To identify the planets, researchers compared images of the system, known to contain planets HF8799b, HF8799c, and HF8799d.  In each image faint objects were detected, and by comparing images from over the years, it was confirmed that these were the planets in their expected positions and that they orbit their star in a counterclockwise direction.

NASA's Hubble Space Telescope at about the same time picked up images of a fourth planet, somewhat unexpectedly.  The new planet, Fomalhaut b orbits the bright southern star Fomalhaut, part of the constellation Piscis Australis (Southern Fish) and is relatively massive -- about three times the size of Jupiter.  The planet orbits 10.7 billion miles from its home star and is approximately 25 light-years from Earth. 

Hubble astronomer Paul Kalas describes the challenge of obtaining the images, stating, "Our Hubble observations were incredibly demanding. Fomalhaut b is 1 billion times fainter than the star.  We began this program in 2001, and our persistence finally paid off."

NASA and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s use of direct-imaging to "see" planets marks a new era in astronomy.  Says Bruce Macintosh of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, California, "After all these years, it's amazing to have a picture showing not one but three planets.  The discovery of the HR 8799 system is a crucial step on the road to the ultimate detection of another Earth."

While none of the planets were even remotely habitable, they are an important step towards imaging habitable worlds.  Their discovery brings the total of known extrasolar planets to 326.

The photographs were published in two research studies in the American Association for the Advancement of Science's journal Science Express.  They can be viewed here [1] [2].



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Awesome...but...
By nomagic on 11/16/2008 10:35:14 AM , Rating: 2
How long would it take to send a probe there?




RE: Awesome...but...
By eickst on 11/16/2008 10:41:21 AM , Rating: 2
Assuming we had the ability to send a probe at the speed of light, 25 years. Seeing how that isn't possible, I doubt you'll see a probe travel there in your lifetime.


RE: Awesome...but...
By quiksilvr on 11/16/2008 10:52:55 AM , Rating: 2
We just need the Large Hadron Collider to be fixed so that we can make two black holes to stretch the fabric of the space time continuum and jump to other galaxies.


RE: Awesome...but...
By StevoLincolnite on 11/16/2008 11:21:53 AM , Rating: 5
Or just simply buy a StarGate off Ebay.


RE: Awesome...but...
By Tsuwamono on 11/16/2008 6:08:51 PM , Rating: 2
But then you might have to simply rent it... And if that happens they may just take it back...


RE: Awesome...but...
By mbeenon on 11/17/2008 7:28:06 PM , Rating: 2
But the need for space travel will be eliminated, simply by a small leap in computer technology . A super computer could make calculations of what exactly is out there, right to the nanometer , thus providing the information required to generate an image, or even a replica of the environment from a different planet, no matter how many light-years away it is.

Then we can just browse around, take samples, even smell the gas from a different planets atmosphere thanks to our handy little computer that probably will exist in the next era of technology.


RE: Awesome...but...
By DJMiggy on 11/18/2008 12:03:02 AM , Rating: 2
The Matrix has you.


RE: Awesome...but...
By kzrssk on 11/18/2008 1:36:41 PM , Rating: 2
The problem with that, though, is that we still need to colonize other planets in case our solar system encounters some sort of cataclysmic event which destroys it. So having a tour from our own backyard is fine and dandy, but we need to perpetuate our race. Especially if we're going to have to war with aliens... Or robots that we've created that make themselves look like us.


RE: Awesome...but...
By AlexWade on 11/16/2008 9:32:53 PM , Rating: 3
So I said "super collider, I just met her. And then they built the super collider."


RE: Awesome...but...
By ceisman on 11/16/2008 11:00:23 AM , Rating: 2
a light year is 5,865,696,000,000 miles (9,460,800,000,000 kilometers). Even if a probe could travel at the speed of light it would take 25 years to reach this part of space. It is currently impossible because a typical space shuttle travels 17,500 miles per hour (in the range or orbit, some travel at 25,000 mph, therefor devide the numbers roughly in half), meaning that it would take 335,198,228.57 hours or 38,264.64 years to travel ONE light year. It is compounded by the fact that the Shuttles would not be able to hold enought supercold liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen to fuel the journey, with the proper amount of fuel it may travel the speed of Lance Armstrong riding a bike, if it would move at all.


RE: Awesome...but...
By retrospooty on 11/16/2008 11:14:33 AM , Rating: 3
Suffice to say its impossible with our current tech. It would take a massive new discovery of yet unknown science for us to ever travel to other stars.


RE: Awesome...but...
By masher2 (blog) on 11/16/2008 2:04:19 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
"It is compounded by the fact that the Shuttles would not be able to hold enought supercold liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen to fuel the journey, with the proper amount of fuel it may travel the speed of Lance Armstrong riding a bike..."
Eh? Once in motion, objects in space move forever: Newton's First Law. A constant expenditure of fuel is only required to accelerate or decelerate...not simply to keep moving.

The space shuttle could in theory make such a trip, as long as it has enough fuel to exceed Earth's escape velocity, it can in theory reach any point in the Universe -- after enough millions of years.

With current technology, though, our best bet for an interstellar probe isn't a rocket, though, but rather a light sail. Build a large reflector out of ultralight materials, unfurl it near the sun, and light pressure will quickly accelerate it to an appreciable fraction of the speed of light.


RE: Awesome...but...
By JonnyDough on 11/16/2008 3:06:21 PM , Rating: 4
I would think some fuel would still be required to steer clear of gravitational fields. It probably isn't a direct line through the void to get to a place that far away. There is likely to be some gravitational field somewhere along the route that would draw a tiny ship towards it, and would probably set it slightly off course.


RE: Awesome...but...
By Cogman on 11/16/2008 3:10:59 PM , Rating: 1
Nope, it is a direct shot. How do I know this? Because we can see the star and the planet. Light follows the gravitational fields, so will the ship. If the ship is aimed straight at the star, then it will get there eventually.


RE: Awesome...but...
By pxavierperez on 11/16/2008 4:11:18 PM , Rating: 3
maybe i'm imagining this but didn't Voyager 1 probe used the gravity of the sun to catapult it to deep space? also i think V1 left our solar system already.


RE: Awesome...but...
By ikkeman on 11/16/2008 4:34:07 PM , Rating: 2
debatable - it's not beyond the oord cloud yet

http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/didyouknow.htm...
bottom of the page


RE: Awesome...but...
By sld on 11/17/2008 2:11:01 AM , Rating: 2
Of course it's not beyond the Oort Cloud... the Oort Cloud's existence is based on a few non-verifiable premises and exists as a hypothetical construct in the minds of astronomers (and of course, the public).


RE: Awesome...but...
By Samus on 11/17/2008 3:06:46 AM , Rating: 2
I'd be willing to bet we'll be able to launch probes at near-light-speed in our lifetime.

In space, velocity is constant as their is no resistance, so the only requirement to achieving light speed is getting it up to that speed. You just turn the 'engine' off from there and count the years...

Magnetic ion, magma drive and many other propulstion technologies in the works are very promising for this task. Unfortunately, even if we were to achieve light speed one day, sending a human being on a 25-year one-way mission is highly unlikely, especially with the weak amount of available light for growing food, producing heat and generating electricity once they exit our solar system making the trip uninhabitable :(