backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 95 comment(s) - last by The0ne.. on Nov 7 at 10:52 AM


2010 Ford Fusion  (Source: Ford)
Ford unveils "renewed" Fusion complete with new powertrain options

Ford's Fusion has been a moderate success for the company in the mid-size sedan category. While the Fusion doesn't have the sales numbers to put it toe-to-toe with the Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, and Nissan Altima, the vehicle is nonetheless a competent entry in one of the most fiercely contested auto segments in North America.

Now that the Fusion has been on the market for a few years, Ford is ready to give the vehicle a makeover. Stylistically, the vehicle received new front and rear fascias, although the only press shot provided by Ford is of the vehicle's dramatic new front.

The new front end styling seems to merge the current three-bar grill prominent with Ford's current North American styling theme with the more organic shapes found on the European market Mondeo, Ka, and Fiesta (as evidenced by the fog lamp shapes and lower air dam). The hood also features a prominent "power bulge" to accentuate the changes under hood.

When it comes to the powertrain, Ford is introducing a new 175 HP 2.5-liter inline-4 engine -- also available in the all-new Mazda6 and upcoming second generation Mazda3 -- which replaces the old 2.3 liter engine. Ford also massaged the 3.0-liter V6 to produce 240 HP (up 19HP from before). The engine is also capable of running on E85.

For those that crave even more power, the corporate 3.5-liter V6 engine is also available with 263 HP on tap. The 3.5-liter V6 is also used in the Ford Edge and Ford Flex crossovers.

All three of the above engines will be paired with a six-speed automatic transmission.

The most interesting news about the new Fusion, however, is that a new hybrid version of the vehicle is in the works. The new Fusion Hybrid will use the 2.5-liter inline-4 and a heavily revamped version of the hybrid system used in the current Ford Escape and Mercury Mariner. Ford managed to reduce the number of cells used in the battery pack by 20 percent while at the same time boosted the power output by each individual cell by 20 percent.

The new NiMH battery pack is now 30 percent smaller than the one featured in the Escape/Mariner Hybrids and weighs 23 percent less. The reduced dimensions and weight also means that the battery pack no longer requires its own A/C unit to stay cool which also saves weight.

Ford boosted the power generated by the electric motor from 70 kW to 93 kW, while generator output rose from 45 kW to 70 kW. As a result, the new Fusion Hybrid can now reach speed of up to 47 MPH on battery power alone -- this is up from 24 MPH on the Escape/Mariner Hybrids.

Best of all, the significant improvements to the hybrid powertrain will translate into big mileage gains for drivers. Ford says that the Fusion Hybrid will achieve 5 MPG better EPA ratings in the city than the Toyota Camry Hybrid (EPA rated 33 MPG city).

Ford has high hopes for its reinvigorated midsize offering, and the Fusion Hybrid most certainly will be leading its efforts.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Fugly
By JAB on 11/2/2008 10:32:37 PM , Rating: 4
It is a real shame that they did not keep the looks of the European model it looks worlds better.




RE: Fugly
By Samus on 11/2/2008 10:53:25 PM , Rating: 1
I'm so tired of the plastic chrome crap on all these new cars.

My 2002 SVT Focus is still the best looking North American Ford ever produced simply because it doesn't have one piece of simulated chrome on it ;)


RE: Fugly
By Operandi on 11/2/2008 11:52:31 PM , Rating: 2
I have to agree, the SVT Focus is one of best looking cars of decade in my opinion.

Speaking of SVT... where is that SVT Fusion they promised a couple of years ago?


RE: Fugly
By Desslok on 11/3/2008 12:26:45 AM , Rating: 2
That died with the SVT team along with the next gen Lighting.


RE: Fugly
By Samus on 11/3/2008 1:30:21 AM , Rating: 2
It still amazes me Ford canned SVT. They were not only profitable, but they released products to a market segment that now doesn't exist. Not everyone's looking for a Mustang as a performance vehicle or a daily driver. Half the people on the Focus forum have turned to Mitsubishi, Subaru and even Dodge (SRT-4) for newer vehicles.

We don't expect SVT vehicles to be reliable, and they aren't. Mine breaks all the time...mostly because its a Focus anyway but also some of the technical SVT stuff like the intake manifold actuator and the variable cam timing sensor. I've also had issues with the heated seat heating element failing in my drivers seat (the butt warmer pad is MIA) and all kinds of issues with the terrible Getrag 6-speed transmission.

I still love the car, even though its a piece of shit :) I just hope Ford doesn't turn into Toyota and ignore all their performance-oriented customers.

Toyota hasn't produced a real sports car for nearly 10 years, and I have little to no respect for them in not doing so.


RE: Fugly
By Jedi2155 on 11/3/2008 2:16:17 AM , Rating: 4
And they've been doing great (and profitable) since....


RE: Fugly
By Spuke on 11/3/2008 11:22:25 AM , Rating: 2
SVT was canned because no one bought their products. No sales = no existe. The older Focus may have looked better but didn't sell. The new Focus is ugly but sells MUCH better than the old.


RE: Fugly
By ElFenix on 11/4/2008 3:05:59 PM , Rating: 2
iirc, SVT was basically the baby of one guy who left.


RE: Fugly
By Operandi on 11/3/2008 12:15:10 PM , Rating: 3
Thats pretty sad news...

I guess that leaves Japan and Germany then.


RE: Fugly
By Myrandex on 11/3/2008 3:48:54 PM , Rating: 2
:( Poor lightning. The pre-production shots made that thing look pretty hot!


RE: Fugly
By mdogs444 on 11/3/08, Rating: 0
RE: Fugly
By FITCamaro on 11/3/2008 8:11:43 AM , Rating: 1
RE: Fugly
By Lord 666 on 11/3/2008 8:17:56 AM , Rating: 2
Is that your YELLOW Cobalt in the background?


RE: Fugly
By FITCamaro on 11/3/08, Rating: 0
RE: Fugly
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 11/3/2008 8:34:28 AM , Rating: 3
WOW, a two-door Cadillac Catera, err, Opel Omega. That design is straight out of the mid-90s and should have never come to the U.S. market looking like that.

I'll take the new Nissan 370Z. It should rip the new Camaro a new one given how lightweight it will be:

338 HP
270 lb-ft
3144 lbs.

That's compared to 3,741 lbs for the Camaro V6 (300HP) and 3,860 lbs for the Camaro SS (400HP).

http://i36.tinypic.com/ieeejm.jpg
http://i38.tinypic.com/317b0yf.jpg


RE: Fugly
By theapparition on 11/3/2008 9:05:16 AM , Rating: 2
Nice try.
The new 6 speed Camaro will have the LS3 and is conservatively listed at 425+hp and even more importantly 400+ft-lbs. The automatic will have the L99 and 400hp engine.
While I'm definately disappointed at the weight, it will still boast a better power-weight ratio than the 370Z. Torque is key when talking about launches and the 370Z will NOT be competitive. In fact, it will get thoroughly destroyed in most tests. 370Z would have the edge in handling tests.

However, you're trying to compare 2 completely different animals. I don't think many potential buyers of either car would seriously consider the other one.

Personally, I'm not excited about the Camaro. Butt ass ugly (not a fan of either the Challenger/Charger or retro Mustang designs either), and the interior is undoubtedly the fugliest I've seen in a long time.

However, your comment about the GTO being an Opel is off base. It's a direct Holden Monaro with Pontiac "look at me cladding". Even though the styling is cavalier bland, it's a remarkably good handling car, is very comfortable to drive and live with, and has excellent performance. It also should not be confused as a sports car.......the GTO is more of a tourer and competed with similarly priced BMW's, just like the G8 (Holden Commodore) does now.


RE: Fugly
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 11/3/2008 9:16:33 AM , Rating: 4
The Camaro is lumped in the same category as the Mustang, 350Z/370Z, Mazda RX-8, and the upcoming Hyundai Genesis Coupe. They're the only two-door RWD coupes available in the $25,000 -- $30,000 price bracket.

My comment about the 370Z kicking the Camaro's ass was more aimed at the V6 version, but it should also be pretty competitive with the SS.

quote:
However, your comment about the GTO being an Opel is off base. It's a direct Holden Monaro with Pontiac "look at me cladding". Even though the styling is cavalier bland...


Hmmm...

quote:
The Pontiac GTO was relaunched in the United States in 2004, based on the Holden Monaro's V platform. The Monaro is a 2 door coupe variant of the Australian developed VT/VX Holden Commodore. The Commodore was in turn developed by enlarging the European designed 1994 Opel Omega B, which was marketed in its original form in the U.S. from 1997 to 2001 as the Cadillac Catera. The revival was prompted by former GM chairman Bob Lutz,[1] who drove a Holden Monaro while on a business trip in Australia.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontiac_GTO#2004


RE: Fugly
By FITCamaro on 11/3/2008 11:10:00 AM , Rating: 1
You're comparing the base model V6 Camaro to the Nissan when the Nissan will be the same price as the V8 Camaro? Not exactly a fair comparison.


RE: Fugly